Member News

Houthoff | AFM on Provision of Information Policy Rules, Two Studies and AI’s Impact on Financial Sector

In this News Update we discuss: AFM’s consultation on the revised Policy Rule regarding the provision of information; two AFM studies: ‘Buy now, pay later’ and ‘Design of crypto apps’, and; AFM and DNB’s report on the impact of AI on the financial sector.

We further highlight some other financial regulatory publications issued since our last News Update. Subscribe here to the News Update Financial Regulatory.

AFM’S CONSULTATION ON THE REVISED POLICY RULE REGARDING THE PROVISION OF INFORMATION

The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) recently launched a consultation (in Dutch only) on its revised Policy Rule regarding the provision of information (Beleidsregel Informatieverstrekking)The policy document has been supplemented with interpretations, some of which stem from new regulations. The AFM has expanded the list of examples of incorrect or misleading information, and has introduced a topic addressing the question of who provides the information. Additionally, the AFM explains that information provided in podcasts, apps and social media (i.e. affiliate marketing) could qualify as an advertisement, as could each separate web page. New chapters have been added on the requirements regarding second pillar pensions and the need for information provided by investment firms and for investment funds to be fair, clear and not misleading, particularly in relation to risks. The document further states that the competent authority’s name must not be used in a manner that implies consent or for commercial purposes.

The consultation period ends on 31 May 2024.

TWO AFM STUDIES: ‘BUY NOW, PAY LATER’ AND ‘DESIGN OF CRYPTO APPS’

In its Annual Report 2023, the AFM highlighted various developments, including the increased use of ‘buy now, pay later’ facilities (BNPL) and the design of crypto apps. It has also published studies on these topics, which are briefly discussed below.

BUY NOW, PAY LATER (BNPL)

Highlights of the AFM’s 2022 BNPL study and subsequent market update on the subject include the following:

  • Market landscape: although the number of users has decreased in recent years, the volume of transactions continues to rise. An emerging trend is the growth of BNPL in physical stores, either via specific payment cards or the store’s webshop. The AFM warns that normalising deferred payment methods in physical stores increases the risk of debt habituation, in particular among younger persons. This may lead to irresponsible lending and the accumulation of debt.
  • Code of Conduct: established in October 2023, the sector’s Code of Conduct requires BNPL providers to provide clear information on costs, conditions of use, and payment obligations. Additionally, providers must implement a complaints procedure. Despite the Code of Conduct, the AFM emphasises the need for BNPL consumer protection regulation at European level. Practices or developments that raise concerns include unauthorised BNPL use by persons under 18. To avoid debt accumulation, the AFM stresses that, before granting BNPL, providers should consult the register of the Credit Registration Agency (Bureau Kredietregistratie), and should also register BNPL arrears. Fees for late payment are another point of attention. The Dutch Supreme Court has submitted preliminary questions on this topic to the Court of Justice of the European Union, whose ruling is expected late in 2024 at the earliest.
  • Consumer Credit Directive (CCD II): this European Directive must be transposed into Dutch law by 20 November 2025 at the latest. As of 20 November 2026, BNPL providers will be in scope of CCD II, unless an exemption applies, resulting in the obligation to obtain a licence and to meet the pre-contractual and contractual information requirements. The extent to which the Dutch legislature will use the Member State options is not yet known. From November 2026, upon implementation of the CDD II, the AFM will also supervise the BNPL sector.

 

DESIGN OF CRYPTO APPS

The AFM conducted its survey on the design of the crypto apps in 2023, focusing on three Dutch crypto services providers. The results of the survey were published on 9 April 2024. The report is available in Dutch only.

The AFM observes that the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) does not provide any guidance on how to address the risks associated with the use of crypto apps, especially the steering or nudging elements in these apps. Since MiCA does not set requirements on the design of the apps’ choice environment, the AFM encourages the crypto industry to design their apps’ choice architecture in the best interests of the customer.

Following the survey, the AFM recognised the following risks for users of crypto apps that remain after implementation of MiCA:

  • The apps provide low-threshold access for a large audience;
  • The apps are designed to nudge users towards trading certain tokens, activating additional services, and to use the apps frequently.

 

AFM AND DNB’S REPORT ON THE IMPACT OF AI ON THE FINANCIAL SECTOR

On 9 April 2024, the AFM and the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) published their report “The Impact of AI on the Financial Sector and Supervision” (“De impact van AI op de financiële sector en het toezicht“, in Dutch only). The report sets out their principles and focus areas for supervising AI use by financial businesses, and shares them with the market. In order to initiate dialogue on the subject with the sector, the AFM and DNB plan to organise a seminar and one or more round-table meetings later this year. They have also already engaged with various institutions. In addition, DNB is set to perform a thematic examination of AI use among insurers this year.

In their report, the regulatory authorities address various relevant aspects of AI use in the financial sector, largely basing their discussion on international research. The subjects covered include the extent to which financial businesses use AI, how they use it, AI risks and opportunities, and the impact that AI can have on supervision methods. The report also looks at the requirements that will ensue for financial businesses from the draft EU AI Act, compliance with which will be subject to AFM and DNB supervision.

Potential advantages of AI use in the financial sector include faster service, improved range of services, and increased efficiency of internal processes. However, disadvantages mentioned by the regulatory authorities include GDPR data processing violations, discrimination and exclusion, and dependence on large AI platforms. As for supervision, they point out that financial supervision rules apply in full to AI use in the financial sector. This means, for example, that the use in question must be consistent with sound and ethical business operations and align with the requirement to put clients’ interests first.

 

 

For more information on any financial regulatory questions, please contact Berry van WijkJuan VervuurtLisanne Haarman or Gijs Hamelijnck.

 

 

Compliments of Houthoff – a member of the EACCNY.