Trade News

Trade News
08
May
By Marc Chandler, Chief Market Strategist, Bannockburn Capital Markets
If trade imbalances truly drive protectionist backlash, as many claim, we should have witnessed comparable anti-trade sentiment during the 1980s when America's deficit with Japan reached historic proportions. Yet history reveals a critical distinction: Japan was offered—and wisely seized—an economic escape valve that today's geopolitical climate threatens to deny China. This asymmetry not only betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of how global trade evolved but risks triggering an unprecedented economic disruption.
Japan's solution...
08
May
WASHINGTON D.C. — Today, the United States and the United Kingdom announced a historic trade deal – providing unprecedented access to the U.K. markets while bolstering U.S. national security.
The reciprocal tariff rate of 10%, as originally announced on Liberation Day, will remain. The trade deal will increase tariff revenue dramatically, bringing in billions of dollars in new revenue.
The deal removes longstanding U.K. market barriers creating a $5 billion opportunity of new exports for U.S. farmers, ranchers, and producers. These exports include...
07
May
By Joe Brusuelas, Chief Economist, RSM
Key takeaways
The U.S. attempt to rebalance the global economy has resulted in the flight of capital out of the country.
The primary consequence of this effort has been a declining dollar and rising Treasury yields.
Any policy that devalues the dollar or seeks to end its status as the reserve currency harms American interests.
The United States’ attempt to rebalance the global economy to better serve its interests has resulted in the flight of...
07
May
By William R. Rhodes and Stuart P.M. Mackintosh
It is delusional to think that the Trump administration will devise a viable, let alone sensible, trade policy before its 90-day pause on “reciprocal” tariffs ends. Before prices spike and the economy starts shrinking, legislators and business leaders must recognize that there is no strategy and respond accordingly.
WASHINGTON, DC – In November 2024, the consensus among economists was clear. The United States was powering ahead of all other advanced economies, a trend reflected in...
06
May
By Thomas Taylor and David Wegman, Trepp
On April 2, 2025, President Trump launched the opening moves in what has become the most encompassing trade war seen in the modern era. Since then, securities markets have reacted to breaking news on this topic with extreme swings. Taken individually or collectively, how will the economic shocks from the developing trade war impact commercial real estate (CRE) and market participants?
Market Shocks & CRE
One of the most immediate effects of policy uncertainty on capital...
05
May
U.S. container imports from China have dropped sharply due to steep tariffs, especially the 145% China-specific rate. Ports like Los Angeles and Long Beach, which heavily rely on Chinese goods, face major volume losses. China’s share in imports such as electronics, plastics, toys, and furniture is high, and no other sourcing countries can match the lost volume. Analysts are warning the decline will hurt local jobs and port economies. Despite signals that large retailers may resume some sourcing from China, policy...
02
May
By Rachel Szymanski, Chief Economist, Trepp
Significant back-and-forth on tariffs has led to unprecedented trade policy uncertainty and large swings in asset prices. While there is now a 90-day pause on some tariffs, others remain in place. This reprieve offers some relief, but the uncertainty itself has substantial effects on behavior, where market participants may delay economic decisions and take risk mitigation measures.
This blog outlines the ripple effects of uncertainty throughout the economy and the implications for commercial real estate...
02
May
By Vanessa Gunnella, Giovanni Stamato and Alicja Kobayashi
Published as part of the ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 3/2025.
This box examines how the tariffs that the United States introduced on Chinese products in 2018 influenced euro area trade patterns. It looks at whether euro area exporters were able to gain market share in the United States as their competitiveness increased vis-à-vis their Chinese counterparts. It also assesses how Chinese export patterns changed, highlighting how Chinese exports were diverted from the United States...
Other Chapter News






